WASHINGTON 鈥� At a D.C. committee hearing Thursday, police Chief Peter 海角社区appham discussed a recent stop-and-frisk incident in Northeast that has prompted criticism about how the department polices some of the District’s communities.
And while he defended the officers鈥� asking a group of men for ID last month, he agreed with one council member that officers need to be mindful of avoiding tension with the public moving forward.
The June 22 incident near Sheriff Road and Eastern Avenue involved members of the police department鈥檚 gun-recovery unit. They were already in the area, 海角社区appham said, when they found a group of men drinking from open containers of alcohol and publicly smoking marijuana.
What raised officers鈥� concern, 海角社区appham said, was that the group was near a car that had tinted windows and that lacked proper registration.
“Those types of vehicles in our community 鈥� are used frequently in robberies throughout the city,” the chief told members of the D.C. Committee on the Judiciary and Public Safety Thursday.
The officers then asked the people in the group to provide identification.
The incident was chronicled on smartphone video and police body cameras and by Advisory Neighborhood Commissioner Anthony Lorenzo Green, who alleged in to the chief that a man in the group who had a BB gun confiscated was an undercover officer.
"For over the last 35 hours since this was brought to my attention, I have been speaking with community members and reviewing numerous videos posted on social media to figure out what kind of "community policing" does MPD consider this to be?"
— A. Lorenzo Green (@LorenzoANC7C04)
鈥淚 can say unequivocally that that is not true. That was not a Metropolitan Police Department officer. 鈥� That young man was not working with the Metropolitan Police Department,鈥� said 海角社区appham, adding that the BB gun was not planted on the person either.
Police recovered a vial of PCP, as well as marijuana and a scale during the incident.
The chief told the committee that when officers had approached the group, they had told the men that they were not concerned about the marijuana or open containers. Ward 6 council member Charles Allen questioned whether it was appropriate to ask for IDs anyway. 海角社区appham said yes.
鈥淚f it鈥檚 not probable cause,鈥� Allen asked, 鈥渋s the justification that the officer 鈥� observed a lump in the waistband?鈥�
“I can’t tell you what was going on in his mind,鈥� 海角社区appham said. 鈥淭hat will come out in the course of the investigation.”
Nevertheless, 海角社区appham defended the move to ask subjects for their IDs.
“I think it was not only appropriate, but I think it was within their responsibility to search the immediate area for additional contraband,鈥� said the chief, adding that he was most concerned about the tension between both groups. Allen agreed.
鈥淭hat is what we do not want,鈥� the committee chairman said. 鈥淚 think what we’re trying to establish is how did we get to that level of tension.”
The chief told the committee that the department is reviewing the incident carefully to avoid that moving forward.
鈥淲e try to do that with every circumstance where misconduct is alleged, is to say ‘How can we do this better?'” 海角社区appham said.
is set for 5 p.m. at the Deanwood Recreation Center, 1350 49th St. NE.
海角社区app’s Megan Cloherty contributed to this report.
