This article was republished with permission from 海角社区app’s news partners at . Read the story at Maryland Matters.
This content was republished with permission from 海角社区app鈥檚 news partners at . Sign up for today.
As Del. C.T. Wilson (D-Charles) has done for several years, he stood on the House of Delegates floor Friday morning to implore his colleagues to support legislation on behalf of child sexual abuse survivors.
In past years, efforts to pass similar bills have found success in the House, but stalled in the Senate.
But this year, Sen. William C. Smith Jr. (D-Montgomery), chair of the Judicial Proceedings Committee, ushered legislation through his chamber that passed March 16.
This year鈥檚 House vote on brought an intense feeling of relief for survivors such as Wilson, who hugged House Judiciary Chair Luke Clippinger (D-Baltimore City), after a resounding 132-2 vote. The chamber .
Before Wilson cast his vote in support of the bill labeled The Child Victims Act of 2023, he had a message for survivors.
鈥淚 just want these people to understand that you are heard [and] you鈥檙e not alone,鈥� he said. 鈥淔or the individuals in this body, in the State House, your staff that reached out to me over the years 鈥� dozens and dozens 鈥� and told me their story, shared with me something they won鈥檛 share with anybody else: This is hope.鈥�
After the House adjourned, Wilson greeted David and Judy Lorenz of Prince George鈥檚 County in the State House hallway. David Lorenz, a child sexual abuse survivor, serves as Maryland director of the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, also called SNAP.
鈥淭hank you, C.T.,” Lorenz said. “A whole lot of people will sleep easier tonight.”
鈥淭hank you for sticking with it all these years,鈥� Wilson replied.
In a brief interview, Wilson said he plans to focus on his health after the vote.
鈥淚 feel like I can finally stop focusing on helping other people and maybe start helping myself. I鈥檝e spent years helping everybody else and avoided my own issues and they鈥檝e just gotten worse,鈥� he said. 鈥淲ith this chapter being closed, I can at least continue the story by doing some self-help鈥ecause it took a lot out of me this year. It really put me in a dark little pit that I鈥檝e got to crawl out of now. But I can rest assured that at least we鈥檝e done our best for what we can do.鈥�
There are still some procedural steps the bill must take before final passage in the legislature. Wilson’s bill is identical to a Senate measure that’s making its way through the House of Delegates. One of the bills must be passed by the second chamber before it will be sent to Gov. Wes Moore (D) for consideration.
The bills, as amended, lift previous statutory time limits and will allow survivors to sue their abusers or organizations that harbored them 鈥渁t any time.鈥�
The bill also caps liability for public entities at $890,000. It would increase the聽聽to $1.5 million for claims against private institutions for non-economic damages such as pain and suffering. In addition, it removes the cap for economic damages for costs of services such as therapy or medical treatment.
If both chambers complete the formal approval process by the session鈥檚 last day April 10, Gov. Wes Moore (D) plans to sign the legislation once it reaches his desk.
鈥淕ov. Moore鈥ommends Chairman Wilson and the child abuse survivors who have courageously told their stories and pushed for this legislation to pass,鈥� Moore鈥檚 spokesperson Carter Elliott IV said in a text message. 鈥淕ov. Moore looks forward to signing this bill into law to protect Maryland鈥檚 children.鈥�
鈥楤ravo to Wilson and Smith鈥�
Wilson credit for his work on the legislation since 2017 when he successfully led a bill to extend the age limit from 25 to 38 for someone to sue for child sexual abuse.
However, lawmakers have debated since about whether it would be unconstitutional to repeal a statute of repose, a provision in the 2017 bill meant to prevent additional future changes to the law, which most lawmakers didn’t appear at the time to fully understand.
Kathleen Hoke, a University of Maryland professor, explained the legal concept of a statute of repose to lawmakers聽 during a briefing with the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee. She said a statute of repose typically exists relating to liability in building construction and includes an exception for cases involving harm from asbestos because it鈥檚 a public health concern.
While this year’s law is nearly certain to be challenged in court,聽Attorney General Anthony Brown (D) wrote in earlier this year that he can 鈥渋n good faith defend the legislation.鈥�
Meanwhile, Brown鈥檚 office is preparing to release findings of an investigation into alleged abuse by clergy in the state. The attorney general鈥檚 office said it鈥檚 鈥渕oving as expeditiously as possible鈥� to release the report.
Susan Gibbs, spokesperson for the Maryland Catholic Conference, said in a statement Friday the Catholic dioceses in the state have sought to protect minors and published names of those 鈥渒nown to have harmed. This commitment to protect and heal has stood and will stand regardless of the law.鈥�
However, the conference still opposes House Bill 1 鈥渂ased on constitutional concerns and the lack of parity between public and private entities.鈥�
Del. Mark Fisher (R-Calvert), who supports the Catholic Church and its universities and private schools, also acknowledged survivors deserved to be heard.
鈥淲e don鈥檛 want this incredible institution to go away, but we also must be critical thinkers to give these individuals justice,鈥� Fisher, who voted in favor of the legislation, said on the House floor.
Kathryn Robb, executive director of Child USAdvocacy based in Philadelphia, praised Wilson and Smith for their work. Robb, whose organization conducts national advocacy and research on child sexual abuse, has testified alongside both lawmakers in Annapolis.
鈥淏ravo to Del. C.T. Wilson, Sen. William Smith and all the brave survivors and advocates!鈥� Robb said in a text message Friday. 鈥淭his is a great day for Maryland and basic notions of justice! Maryland moves to the front of class for child protection and justice!鈥�
