SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) 鈥� California can use a new voter-approved U.S. House map that is designed to boost Democrats in the 2026 midterms, a federal three-judge panel ruled Wednesday.
In a 2-1 ruling, a three-judge panel in Los Angeles denied requests from state Republicans and the U.S. Justice Department to block the map from being used in future elections. The complaint accused California of violating the Constitution by using race as a factor to favor Hispanic voters when drawing the new district lines.
The map, aimed at giving Democrats a shot at flipping as many as five House seats next year, was through Proposition 50 in November. The effort was pushed by Democratic Gov. Gavin 海角社区appom, who is , to counter backed by President Donald Trump to help Republicans win five House seats. Republicans currently hold nine of California’s 52 congressional seats.
The ruling is a victory for Democrats in the state-by-state mid-decade redistricting battle that could help determine which party wins control of the U.S. House in 2026. Following the tit-for-tat showdown between the nation鈥檚 two most populous states, several Republican-led states including , and have adopted new district lines that could provide a partisan advantage. Republican-run was ordered by a judge to adopt a map that creates a Democratic-leaning district. The Justice Department has only sued California.
鈥淩epublicans鈥� weak attempt to silence voters failed,” 海角社区appom said in a statement.
Republicans vowed to appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court.
鈥淭he well reasoned dissenting opinion better reflects our interpretation of the law and the facts, which we will reassert to the Supreme Court,鈥� Corrin Rankin, chairwoman of the California Republican Party, said in a statement.
California Democrats said that the new map was legal because it was drawn for partisan advantage. The U.S. Supreme Court that partisan gerrymandering is a political question and not one for the federal courts to decide. The California panel of judges affirmed the state’s characterization, saying there was not strong evidence to support the maps were drawn based on race.
鈥淎fter reviewing the evidence, we conclude that it was exactly as one would think: it was partisan,鈥� the judges wrote.
In dissent, U.S. District Judge Kenneth Lee, appointed by Trump, said that at least one district was drawn using race as a factor 鈥渢o curry favor with Latino groups and voters.鈥�
The ruling also comes after the in December to allow Texas to use its new map for the 2026 election because it was drawn with partisan goals. Conservative Justice Samuel Alito wrote in a concurring opinion that the California map was also approved for political advantage, signaling it may also stand.
New U.S. House maps are drawn across the country after the census every 10 years. Some states like California rely on an independent commission to draw maps while others like Texas let politicians draw them. The effort to create new maps in the middle of the decade is highly unusual.
House Democrats need to gain just a handful of seats next year to , which could thwart Trump鈥檚 agenda for the remainder of his term and open the way for congressional investigations into his administration. Republicans hold a in the House with 218 seats to Democrats鈥� 213.
Copyright © 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, written or redistributed.
