At the beginning of next year, voters will no longer be able to see if groups of people who work for the same company are contributing to a politician鈥檚 campaign.
West Virginia lawmakers this year redacting employer information from registered political donations more than $250.
Previously, if a dozen employees of 鈥淩ick鈥檚 Pork鈥� donated to politicians who later awarded a lucrative bacon contract to the business, each donation would list the company. Under the new law, the public would only know that the donations came from various butchers.
During legislative debate, Democrats said that not having this information would reduce transparency about who is funding politicians and how they might stand to benefit.
鈥淟ess information is not better,鈥� said Sen. Joey Garcia, D-Marion, during a committee meeting last month.
The legislation also redacts the residential address of donors. Garcia agreed with redacting addresses to prevent doxxing, but said removing a person鈥檚 employer was overkill.
He said sometimes legislation affects only one employer. Under the new law, the public would be unable to see if people who work for that employer are supporting specific politicians.
鈥淭his is secretive,鈥� he said.
The Secretary of State鈥檚 Office will still collect a donor鈥檚 street number, street address and their employer. But this information would be redacted from campaign finance statements released to the public.
Supporters argue that they are making the change to address a rise in political violence and harassment. In debate, they鈥檝e told anecdotes of harassment they鈥檝e received or heard about from others.
鈥淲e鈥檙e not hiding anything,鈥� said Sen. Mike Azinger, a Republican from Wood County and the bill鈥檚 lead sponsor, adding that the internet makes it much easier for people to find and misuse personal information.
鈥淲e鈥檙e trying to protect employers from harassment that happens in horrible ways, often that 30 years ago wasn鈥檛 even contemplated,鈥� he said.
By listing only a donor鈥檚 occupation, the state will be less transparent about how a person makes their money. Someone listed as an 鈥渁ttorney鈥� could be a lawyer who represents natural gas companies, who focuses on people injured in 18-wheeler crashes or who defends doctors in medical malpractice lawsuits.
The public would be able to see that consultants are funding a particular politician, but not that they work for a pharmaceutical or power company.
鈥淚 don鈥檛 think it鈥檚 necessary to have that information of where they work,鈥� said Del. Mike Hornby, R-Berkeley, during a committee meeting last month while debating a House version of the new law.
The legislation has been passed by wide margins in both the Senate and House and was signed by the governor. It takes effect after the general election later this year.
Del. Sean Hornbuckle, D-Cabell, said, 鈥淭his is going to allow, again, yet more money to be put into politics and make it harder for it to be traced.鈥�
___
This story was originally published by and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Copyright © 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, written or redistributed.
