More than 500,000 drivers sped through Honolulu intersections during a five-month trial of speed enforcement cameras last year and got in the mail.
But now that camera enforcement has formally begun, hardly anyone has been ticketed for speeding.
The Hawai驶i Department of Transportation issued only 17 speeding tickets in the first four months of the speed camera program. Two of those were dismissed when the motorists contested them in court.
Even though the cameras are capable of catching far more violators, the state is targeting only the worst of the worst speeders because the projected surge in tickets would overwhelm police and court staff and the judiciary鈥檚 information systems.
The slow rollout presents something of a conundrum: The program was meant to be financially self-sustaining for at least a decade, with revenue from citations covering all operating costs. With ticket fees trickling in more slowly, the transportation department is seeking $6.6 million in state funding in the next fiscal year to pay for camera upgrades and improvements to the court information system.
Ultimately, the transportation department is trying to push ahead with plans to significantly expand the number of traffic cameras on O驶ahu. The department is asking for money to expand the program to 177 cameras across all four major islands, with half of them located on Oahu.
State transportation director Ed Sniffen told lawmakers earlier this year that over 60,000 speeding citations per month would be generated from when they are operating at full capacity.
Honolulu police normally issue between 3,000 and 4,000 speeding-related citations per month, according to legislative reports. That traditional enforcement continues.
The citations need to be sent out according to statute, adding a time pressure to the processing that must include review of videos and photos by HPD鈥檚 traffic division, after preliminary screening by a third-party vendor.
The potential for the torrent of citations to also overwhelm the court system was identified as a concern by the over a year ago. The agency had asked lawmakers to hold off on implementing the program until 2027 so that it could figure out a plan for handling the increase.
Sniffen told the Senate on Jan. 15 during a budget briefing that for now 鈥渨e鈥檝e worked with the judiciary so that we don鈥檛 blow up their systems,鈥� and that the plan now is to roll out cameras at the rate of about 10 new Honolulu intersections every year.
In the meantime, Sniffen revealed the transportation department is only ticketing extreme speeders, not just those slightly over the limit, to restrict the number of tickets sent out.
Sniffen and department spokespeople have declined to say what the agency鈥檚 threshold is, but court dockets show that the motorists fined for speeding so far had been clocked at more than 20 m.p.h. over the set limit.
State law permits tickets from cameras to be issued starting at 11 m.p.h. over the posted limit. Sniffen said that the current threshold ensures that only the 鈥渕ost dangerous drivers were targeted.鈥� That speed threshold will drop as the capacity for processing more tickets expands. They were not limiting the issuing of red-light infractions, he said.
Sniffen was unavailable for interview last week, but six weeks after the system began issuing speeding citations Dec. 15, the transportation department awarded a 10-year contract worth approximately $160 million to Arizona-based to 鈥渆xpand, operate and maintain the camera program.鈥�
It鈥檚 unclear whether the cost of implementing such an expansion has been clearly determined.
In an email last week, state judicial spokesman Brooks Baehr confirmed that the courts had been working with the transportation department to more efficiently integrate the citations transmitted by the cameras into their information system 鈥撯�� a process that used to be completed manually.
鈥淭o date, the Judiciary has been able to successfully process citations generated by the automated red light and speed camera systems. But it also recognizes that a significant increase in citation volume will present operational challenges that would need to be addressed,鈥� he said.
Maj. Herbert Soria of HPD鈥檚 Traffic Division said in an email that three personnel are assigned to review citations, and staffing is adequate at this time.
鈥淏ut, as the program continues to develop,鈥� Soria said, 鈥渢he need for additional staffing can be reassessed.鈥�
Checkered History Of Red Light Cameras
鈥淭he judiciary is right to be concerned here,鈥� said Alex Guirguis, who is co-founder of the Seattle-based company that connects drivers to lawyers who dispute traffic tickets and parking violations. 鈥淟ike Uber for lawyers,鈥� he said.
Guirguis, who lives in Honolulu, said the automated system can create a structural mismatch between the two branches of government.
鈥淎utomated cameras generate citations at volumes that court systems just were not designed to handle,鈥� he said. 鈥淎 typical officer will issue 30 to 50 traffic tickets a day. An automated camera can issue hundreds of tickets a day.鈥�
Guirguis said his company data show that automated ticketing has created a backlog in court In New York, which has had a red light camera system since 1992, 鈥渋t takes over three years to resolve a traffic ticket.鈥�
Some jurisdictions, like California, have chosen to throw out tickets within a certain timeframe just to reduce the administrative backlog.
Hawai驶i is a relative newcomer to the use of red light cameras, but some lawmakers have already proposed the program to detect expired registration and safety tags on moving vehicles.
Legislation that would have enabled that expansion was this week.
Any extra enforcement would come with an additional administrative burden.
鈥淲ithout fail every time a state has started a red light camera program in some small defined manner it has always increased into something more and that鈥檚 what we鈥檙e seeing here,鈥� Gurguis said.
While 23 states including Hawai驶i currently have red light camera programs, their use is by no means universal and they remain politically unpopular.
That鈥檚 particularly true under the Trump administration. A U.S. Department of Transportation spokesman told the that it did not want road safety dollars being used to subsidize expanding red light camera systems because they are 鈥渦nfair revenue schemes.鈥�
In fact eight states 鈥撯�� Maine, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, South Carolina, Texas, West Virginia and Wisconsin 鈥撯�� forbid their use, the National Conference of State Legislators .
Other states have tried, canned and restarted programs for various reasons.
The city of Phoenix which first installed red light cameras in 2001, had to abandon the program in 2019 amidst the fallout from a bribery scandal involving its red light camera vendor Redflex Traffic Systems. The found that the Arizona company had paid a Chicago official $600,00 in bribes to be the preferred red light contractor there.
But Phoenix has just reactivated a , following a surge in accidents and fatalities.
Traffic research over the last 15 years generally supports the theory that the programs can reduce certain kinds of accidents and associated injuries. National Highway Traffic Safety cites a showing they can 鈥渞educe roadway fatalities and injuries by 20% to 37%.鈥�
That reduction was similar to the findings in a 2020 review of from nearly 40 studies that linked red light cameras with a 24% reduction in right-angle, or 鈥渢-bone鈥� collisions.
However, that same review found evidence they can also increase the risk of rear-end crashes as other drivers hard brake to avoid hitting vehicles that stop to avoid running the red light. Automatic sensor technology in newer vehicles is reducing the frequency of those kinds of accidents.
The introduction of 15 cameras in San Francisco last year resulted in a 70% decline in speeding at those locations six months into operation, the city鈥檚 found.
Red Light Camera Hotspots
Red light traffic cameras have been operating at 10 Honolulu intersections since 2022, but Nov. 1 was the start of a new phase of enforcement that included issuing citations for speeding too.
The locations were identified following a department completed in November 2022. In the first three years of the pilot, as the cameras were being brought online, the state issued 1,800 citations to drivers for blowing through red lights.
As of November, all cameras were in operation, and enforcement was ramped up. Between Nov. 1 and Feb. 24, 2,041 citations were issued to registered owners after vehicles were caught on camera running red lights 鈥撯�� an average of 17 offenses per day.
Police and transportation agencies in Hawai鈥檌 say motorists are major contributors to the state鈥檚 accident rate, causing 1,900 crashes between 2015 and 2020, according to the transportation department.
It鈥檚 still early in the Hawai驶i program but Sniffen told legislators in January that there had been a 62% reduction in red-light running since the program started, 鈥渁nd we鈥檙e starting to see reductions in speed鈥�. And, according to the department鈥檚 on the program to the Legislature, the installation of the cameras has already resulted in a 70% reduction in major crashes at the 10 sites in urban Honolulu.
Incidents at just four Honolulu intersections are responsible for over half of all the red-light- running citations during the first 116 days of the expanded camera enforcement program.
The intersection of McCully Street and Algaroba Street in M艒驶ili驶i triggered the most red light signal citations with 372 issued.
The McCully Street corridor is a busy feeder for the H1 freeway west toward the airport and that intersection is the meeting point of a major arterial road and a local street. It also has a posted speed limit of 25 mph, the standard for residential areas.
McCully and Algaroba was closely followed by the intersection of Ward Avenue and King Street with 358 red light citations issued. Both streets are arterial, and Ward also operates with contraflow during peak morning times. The department鈥檚 crash data also shows a high number of pedestrian and cyclist injuries at that location.
One intersection was the source of half of the speeding citations issued in the four months 鈥撯�� the intersection of Pali Highway and School Street.
That鈥檚 where the speed limit on the Pali Highway drops from 30 mph to 25 mph. Court records show however that eight drivers were ticketed for speeds more than double those posted limits.
While noting the benefits of camera programs, an American Civil Liberties Union report on road safety strategies released last week said that red light cameras can disproportionately impact .
The speeding tickets can generate fines of between $177 and $317, depending on the speed clocked, and the red lights citations are $97.
Sen. Donna Kim raised that issue in the Ways and Means Committee hearing in January, saying that constituents were telling her they felt being picked on because six of the 10 cameras currently active, including the Pali Highway/School Road intersection, are in her Kalihi district.
Sniffen said it was the department data that resulted in the selection of those locations.
鈥淚f cameras are concentrated in neighborhoods like Kalihi, which is a working-class residential community, the cost falls overwhelmingly on the locals,鈥� Guirguis, from Off The Record, said. 鈥淚f you have a daily commuter passing the same camera twice a day, they have a different exposure than a tourist who鈥檚 driving through it once, or not at all.鈥�
Any red light camera programs should also include provisions for a proportion of the revenue to be directed at road safety measures that may have lacked sufficient funding, the ACLU said.
In greater Los Angeles, a proportion of the red light camera revenues must be spent on other measures like traffic calming for the camera funding to continue.
___
This story was originally published by and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Copyright © 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, written or redistributed.
