This article was republished with permission from 海角社区app’s news partners at .听Sign up for today.
This content was republished with permission from 海角社区app鈥檚 news partners at Maryland Matters. Sign up for today.
The Prince George鈥檚 County school board appeared poised to accept the results of an ethics report involving several of its members Wednesday night, potentially setting the stage for their removal from office 鈥� but the panel was blocked from proceeding by the members under investigation.
The vote not to accept the findings of the board鈥檚 citizen-led ethics committee came during a four-hour meeting that devolved into chaos, as the board was 鈥� for a time 鈥� deadlocked over its inability to muster the votes to enter executive session, table the ethics motion, or adjourn.
Finally, around 11 p.m., members threw up their hands and adjourned, leaving uncertain the fate of the members under investigation.
In an interview on Thursday, Chairwoman Juanita Miller said she is 鈥渨aiting for legal counsel鈥� to determine how to proceed. 鈥淭his is new territory for all of us.鈥�
The board is without an attorney, as multiple lawyers have quit just this year. (One told听Maryland Matters听it wasn鈥檛 worth the 鈥渉eadache.鈥�)
Prior to the board鈥檚 public meeting, members convened in closed session and voted to accept the ethics committee鈥檚 determination that half of the panel 鈥� seven of the 14 鈥� engaged in acts of wrongdoing.
The seven members under investigation were barred from voting during the closed session.
The substance of the complaints was not disclosed by Miller during the public meeting because they are, by law, supposed to be confidential.
Maryland Matters听听that a five-person ethics panel found sufficient evidence to substantiate three conflict of interest allegations.
One report found that several members of the board who accepted campaign contributions from the Laborers鈥� International Union of North America (LiUNA) later voted to require that future school system capital projects be built by companies pre-approved by the union.
A second report found that members voted to hire a 鈥減rivate lobbyist鈥� with the sole focus of getting the General Assembly to convert the current board 鈥� made up of both elected and appointed members 鈥� to an all-elected body.
A third report concluded that a 鈥渞eorganization鈥� of the board鈥檚 staff was intended 鈥渢o replace existing staff members with politically connected acquaintances and personal friends of certain Board members.鈥�
The ethics panel recommended that six members of the board 鈥� Shayla Adams-Stafford, Raaheela Ahmed, Edward Burroughs III, Kenneth F. Harris II, David Murray and Joshua Thomas 鈥� be removed or resign, and that a seventh member, Belinda Queen, be censured.
The board members subject to the probe have vigorously rejected the allegations.
At least four have hired attorneys; three are represented by former State鈥檚 Attorney Glenn F. Ivey (D).
In an emergency court filing that sought to block the board from acting on the reports on Wednesday, Ryan Lewis, an attorney for Adams-Stafford, alleged that the conflict-of-interest allegations are 鈥渆asily disprovable based on publicly accessible documents.鈥�
He also argued that the investigation was tainted by the release of the tentative findings to the media and that the entire probe must therefore be dissolved.
Lewis鈥檚 bid for a temporary restraining order was denied by Circuit Court Judge William A. Snoddy on Wednesday afternoon.
Potential removal of members
In announcing the board鈥檚 closed-door decision to 鈥渃oncur鈥� with the ethics panel鈥檚 recommendations, Miller, the board chair, said the committee determined that 鈥渃ertain board members鈥� should be removed from office or censured.
The findings would be sent to the Maryland State Board of Education 鈥渢o review and make a recommendation to the governor for signature,鈥� she added.
鈥淚t鈥檚 now public information,鈥� Miller declared.
A former state delegate and a vocal critic of the younger, elected members who are the subject of the allegations, Miller also laid out a process that could result in members being removed from office via the State Ethics Commission.
She that if the state board doesn鈥檛 take action on the findings by Aug. 31, the ethics committee 鈥渋s of the belief that the [state] board will have failed in its statutory duty to properly enforce the state law governing conflicts of interest and on ethical violations.鈥�
The ethics panel, Miller added, 鈥渨ill then consider the option of reporting the [state] board鈥檚 dilatory conduct to the state鈥檚 ethics commission, which鈥� has the authority to compel local boards of education to comply with the requirements of state law.鈥�
In that case, she said, the State Ethics Commission could petition the circuit court to require 鈥渁ny available equitable relief.鈥�
During the meeting, Adams-Stafford suggested that the board鈥檚 closed session action was not valid because it lacked the required number of votes.
Gridlock and disarray
Wednesday鈥檚 meeting went off the rails when Miller called for a public vote to ratify the decisions made in executive session.
That motion failed 6-7, with the members identified in the probe, who weren鈥檛 allowed to vote in the closed session, outvoting Miller and her allies.
(Miller was appointed by County Executive Angela D. Alsobrooks, a Democrat, following the abrupt resignation of Alvin Thornton in December. Her allies consist mostly of other appointed members.)
After the vote, the board then descended into a lengthy period of stalemate that featured cross-talk, questions about procedure, and a series of motions to table the ethics motion, return to executive session or adjourn, all of which failed.
Bill Shelton, an Upper Marlboro attorney who works as a mediator and parliamentarian and who was brought in to referee Wednesday鈥檚 session, expressed the concern that the public was getting information meant to be confidential.
鈥淚 don鈥檛 know who鈥檚 listening to this conversation,鈥� he said of the meeting, which was hold over Zoom.
鈥淨uite frankly, I didn鈥檛 understand the necessity to have a motion to confirm what you鈥檇 already done in the first place,鈥� he added.
Adams-Stafford pointed out that state law requires the board to ratify closed-door decisions in public.
County leaders alarmed by dysfunction
Wednesday鈥檚 session further alarmed county leaders who were already concerned about the board鈥檚 ability to function.
鈥淓ducation is the core of our well-being as a county. Our children cannot afford a dysfunctional system,鈥� said M.H. Jim Estepp, CEO of the Prince George鈥檚 Business Roundtable and a former County Council member.
鈥淎ny allegations of wrongdoing or abuse need to be fully investigated,鈥� he added.
