Roughly six months after the Maryland State Board of Education issued charges against Prince George鈥檚 County School Board Chair Juanita Miller aimed at removing her from office, she鈥檒l get her chance to answer the allegations.
The state board in May issued charges of misconduct in office, willful neglect of duty and incompetence against Miller, stemming from complaints issued by six current and former school board members.
After a hearing Tuesday before the administrative law judge hearing the case, the trial is set to begin Nov. 28. While it鈥檚 expected to run six or seven days, because of other obligations, the case is scheduled to take a break after that week and not conclude until days before Christmas.
By then, Miller might not even be the chair of the county鈥檚 school board anymore. In December, the board that takes office after November’s election will be allowed to appoint its own chair.
The petitioners in the case are former board members Ed Burroughs and Raaheela Ahmed, and current members Joshua Thomas, Shayla Adams-Stafford, Kenneth Harris and David Murray. They鈥檙e acting as individuals and not as the school board.
The case also may not make it to the November trial. The six petitioners have asked the judge for a summary decision ahead of the hearing, which would allow the judge to weigh the evidence presented so far and make a decision by late October.
Any ruling against Miller, whenever it happens, would be subject to appeal. A ruling in her favor could also be essentially ignored by the state school board, which could still take action to remove her from office.
鈥淭his is an important case,鈥� said Judge Richard O鈥機onnor, an administrative law judge. 鈥淭he file in this case is pretty thick. It contains a number of prior complaints by the petitioners to the state board as well as Dr. Miller鈥檚 reply to certain complaints.鈥�
The complaint alleges that Miller failed to sign a contract with a law firm she was required to sign after it was approved by the full school board, and then hiring other lawyers for the school board without the board鈥檚 approval.
Miller is also accused of letting lawyers into a confidential executive board session on two occasions when they weren鈥檛 permitted to attend those meetings, as well as withholding ethics complaints from the local board, and then failing to turn over findings and recommendations from an ethics panel on the complaints so the board could make a final decision.
鈥淭he issues have been pretty well framed by the state board and by the parties in their prehearing statements,鈥� said O鈥機onnor. 鈥淏asically, they are whether Dr. Miller committed misconduct in office, willful neglect of duty, or incompetence. And if so, whether any of those items are sufficient grounds for her removal from the board.鈥�
It鈥檚 still not clear where any hearing would be held. Typically, they鈥檙e handled at the Maryland Offices of Administrative Hearings, in Hunt Valley in Baltimore County. Both sides seemed wary of making the daily trip there for the trial though. A county facility in Landover is also under discussion; it could also end up being conducted virtually 鈥� though that’s not the preference of most involved.
Shortly after the state board issued the charges against Miller, County Executive Angela Alsobrooks, who appointed Miller to lead the board, asked for Miller鈥檚 resignation. But Miller has refused to step down, and under the law Alsobrooks can鈥檛 force her out.
