This article was reprinted with permission from .听
State lawmakers are debating whether to regulate law enforcement departments鈥� use of Automated License Plate Readers (ALPR). They heard聽 constituents鈥� perspectives on the technology and reviewed studies from the Virginia State Crime Commission at a meeting in Richmond on Thursday.
ALPRs are typically mounted cameras (but can also be dashboard cameras) that capture a photograph or video clip of a vehicle and its license plate along with the location, date and time of the capture. The technology has grown in popularity across the country in both public and private sector use 鈥� from聽聽and businesses to聽agencies.
In Thursday鈥檚聽, the commission鈥檚 deputy director Colin Drabert outlined a study and feedback from unnamed 鈥渟takeholders.鈥� Their responses, he said, reflected that there are numerous benefits as well as concerns surrounding law enforcement using the technology.
鈥淔ew rigorous studies have been conducted on the effectiveness of ALPR,鈥� he said. 鈥淗owever, the studies that have been conducted have shown that ALPR is particularly effective in assisting law enforcement with locating stolen vehicles and investigating other offenses.鈥�
He also noted the stakeholders鈥� concern that camera placement in minority communities 鈥渨ould result in disparate impacts to the residents of those communities.鈥�
The Department of Criminal Justice Services is in the process of determining how many Virginia law enforcement agencies are already using ALPR 鈥� information that will be available 鈥渋n the near future,鈥� Drabert said.
At least 18 states currently regulate the use of ALPRs and 17 of them also regulate the length of time that law enforcement can retain data. For instance, New Hampshire allows for three minutes while Alabama allows for up to five years. Several states range from a few weeks to a few months.
Though law enforcement agencies can share data with other public and private entities that use ALPR, Drabert stressed multiple times that ALPR alone does not reveal people鈥檚 identities. He said that law enforcement has to access separate databases to determine who owns a vehicle that was flagged by the technology.
Drabert explained that law enforcement that uses ALPR receives alerts for 鈥渉ot list鈥� features like stolen vehicles or license plates, vehicles associated with people known to be potentially engaged in criminal activity and vehicles associated with missing people.
Charlottesville police chief Michael Kochis made a case for using ALPRs during public comment and said that some community members in his community had been asking for them.
He said that 鈥減eople whose homes were being shot up on a weekly basis鈥� kept asking 鈥渨hen are we going to get it?鈥�
In September, Charlottesville鈥檚 city council approved聽 the installation of Flock Safety Cameras 鈥� a leading ALPR company in America 鈥� following a series of community meetings that garnered mixed feedback from residents.
But common concerns that have emerged in Virginia and nationwide amid the rise in ALPR use have been privacy and prevention of unreasonable searches and seizures by governments.
Norfolk residents recently filed a federal聽challenging the use of Flock cameras, alleging that they violate people鈥檚 Fourth Amendment rights 鈥� which protect against unreasonable searches and seizures.
Drabert noted cases where ALPR use resulted in erroneous searches, such as when a mother and children in Colorado were聽聽after being wrongly suspected of being in a stolen car.
Legal Aid Justice Center attorney Ruby Cherian asked lawmakers to consider 鈥済uardrails鈥� for law enforcements鈥� use of the technology.
鈥淥fficers should be required to get a warrant to search the database to protect privacy rights and prevent misuse and abuse,鈥� she said.
Del. Wren Williams, R-Patrick, asked if a 30-day limit on data storage would be reasonable. Cherian agreed, though she said she鈥檇 like to see a shorter cutoff.
The crime commission will meet again on Dec. 16, when Del. Charniele Herring, D-Alexandria, said some decisions can be made on how to move forward with potential regulations. After Thursday鈥檚 meeting, Herring said that she wants to read through documents stemming from the presentation and analyze other information and cases regarding ALPR use.
鈥淚 think something needs to be in place,鈥� she said.
